E-E-A-T for Medical Clinics — The Basics of Implementation
A concrete approach to applying Google's E-E-A-T evaluation framework to the medical field. It explains the steps for demonstrating Experience/Expertise/Authoritativeness/Trustworthiness on a clinic website.
- 定義
- E-E-A-T
The four elements of page-quality evaluation used in Google's "Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines." Experience / Expertise / Authoritativeness / Trustworthiness. In YMYL fields (especially medical and financial), whether these are implemented has a large impact on page-quality judgments.
Why E-E-A-T Is Especially Effective for Self-pay Care Clinics
The medical field falls under Google's YMYL (Your Money or Your Life), and quality evaluation is applied more strictly than in other fields. The self-pay care field is, furthermore, an area where judgment is difficult for patients and the impact of misinformation is large. For that reason, it is a field where a lack of information demonstrating trustworthiness readily leads to a negative evaluation.
It has been pointed out that similar criteria are emphasized when an LLM chooses which sources to cite, so preparing E-E-A-T is effective on both the SEO and the LLMO fronts.
Implementation Points for Each of the Four Elements
Experience
- The years of clinical experience and case volume of the director and affiliated physicians (in expressions that comply with the advertising guidelines)
- Turning unique insights based on accumulated cases into articles (without identifying individual cases)
- Structuring "treatment area × years of experience" into the profile
Expertise
- Explicitly stating professional societies, board-certification qualifications, and certified-physician qualifications as structured data (Person.hasCredential)
- Preparing a list of academic presentations, papers, and authored books
- Explicitly stating the "field of specialty" with Person.knowsAbout
Authoritativeness
sameAslinks to official society sites, official university pages, and public databases (the physician-and-others qualification-verification search)- Organizing a record of media coverage and interviews (while avoiding exaggerated expressions)
- Preparing an editorial-policy page and an operator-information page
Trustworthiness
- Full disclosure of the operating corporation's information (corporate name, address, contact, representative)
- Privacy policy and conflict-of-interest disclosure
- Explicit sourcing and explicit update dates
- HTTPS and the site's basic technical quality
Priority Implementation List for Structured Data
The structured data that should be implemented on a clinic site is as follows.
OrganizationorMedicalBusiness(operating corporation / clinic)Person(director and affiliated physicians)Article(article pages)BreadcrumbList(all pages)FAQPage(pages containing an FAQ)Service(offered menu)WebSite+SearchAction(the entire site)
Summary
- E-E-A-T works as a substantive filter in the YMYL field
- Self-pay care clinics tend to be weak in the structural demonstration of "Experience" and "Authoritativeness"
- Structured data and transparency of operator information are the highest-ROI move
Sources / References
- Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines — Google / 2025Primary source for the E-E-A-T evaluation framework
- Medical Advertising Guidelines — Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) / 2024-09
FAQ for this article
- Q. How should "Experience" be demonstrated in the medical field?
- A. Organize and display the physician's individual years of clinical experience, case volume (within a range that respects advertising guidelines), professional societies they belong to, and board-certification qualifications. The "Experience" that Google evaluates is whether the person has actually experienced it first-hand. If you want to convey experience in medical practice, structuring the physician profile as structured data is the most powerful approach.
- Q. How detailed should the director's profile be?
- A. Ideally, list their career history, professional societies, board-certification qualifications, published papers, and awards, and use `sameAs` to explicitly link to official society sites, official university pages, and public databases. For LLMO as well, such information contributes to being more likely to be cited.